In the section | Articles |
Title of the article | Structure of Interregional Economic Interactions as a Factor in the Formation of System Effects in National Economies |
Pages | 7-51 |
Author | Natalya Gennadievna Dzhurka Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Senior Research Fellow Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, 680042, Russian Federation Institute of Economics RAS 32 Nakhimovsky Pr., Moscow, 117218, Russian Federatio This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0001-9242-5636 |
Abstract | This paper analyzes the structures of interregional economic interactions in Japan, EU countries, China, Canada, Australia, and Russia and attempts to answer the question of what features distinguish the structure of interregional economic interactions, in which the maximum values of spatial multipliers are achieved. The analysis is based on the central places concept that formalizes the main criteria for typologizing the structures of interregional economic interactions. In accordance with this concept, each structure considered in the article is evaluated for compliance with the functional hierarchy and dominance (in ensuring the homogeneity of the national economic space) of the effects of specialization or agglomeration. The calculations show that only in the case of Australia it is inappropriate to speak about the existence of a functional hierarchy; in other countries there clearly are leading regions that play the role of central places in providing the rest of the regions with goods and services. At the same time, the set of countries united by the criterion of the presence of functional hierarchies in them is not homogeneous in terms of the role of different types of effects in the formation of hierarchical structures. The work explains the variation in the values of spatial multipliers depending on what variant of the structure of interregional economic interactions characterizes the national economic space, and within the framework of this explanation the consequences of illusions of a simple solution to the complex problems of spatial organization of the economy of a ?large? country (in a geographic sense) are clearly demonstrated. The conclusion is formulated that the functional hierarchy based on the implementation of specialization effects and their reasonable combination with agglomeration effects is the structure that expands the area of acceptable values of system-wide indicators of national economies |
Code | 303.725+332.122+339.3 |
JEL | B41, R12, R15 |
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2025.2.007-051 |
Keywords | interregional economic interactions, functional hierarchy, specialization effect, agglomeration effect, typology of structures, multiregional balance, spatial multiplier, national economy, spatial economy, Australia, Canada, China, EU, Russia, Japan |
Download | SE.2025.2.007-051.Dzhurka.pdf |
For citation | Dzhurka N.G. Structure of Interregional Economic Interactions as a Factor in the Formation of System Effects in National Economies. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2025, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 7–51. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2025.2.007-051 (In Russian) |
References | 1. Almazen-Gomez M.A., Llano C., Perez J., Mandras G. The European Regions in the Global Value Chains: New Results with New Data. Papers in Regional Science, 2023, vol. 102, issue 6, pp. 1097–1126. 2. Canadian Supply – Use Tables. Statistics Canada, 2025. Available at: 3. Chen W., Los B., McCann P., Ortega-Argiles R., Thissen M., van Oort F. The Continental Divide? Economic Exposure to Brexit in Regions and Countries on both Sides of the Channel. Papers in Regional Science, 2017, vol. 97, issue 1, pp. 25–54. 4. China Multi-Regional Input-Output Table. 2015. Carbon Emission Accounts and Datasets, 2025. Available at: 5. Christaller W. Central Places in Southern Germany. Translated by C.W. Baskin. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1966, 230 p. 6. Derudder B., Taylor P.J. Central Flow Theory: Comparative Connectivities in the World-City Network. Regional Studies, 2017, vol. 52, issue 8, pp. 1029–1040. 7. Dmitriev R.V. Central Place Theory: From Statics to Dynamics. Edited by L.L. Fituni. Moscow: Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023, 204 p. (In Russian). 8. Dushenin А.I., Ibragimov N.M., Ershov Yu.S. Multipliers in the Analysis of Interregional Interactions. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2023, vol. 16, issue 9, pp. 1630–1643. 9. Dzhurka N.G. Multiregional Models of Economic Interactions: Comparative Analysis. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2024a, no. 2, pp. 7–39. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2024.2.007-039 (In Russian). 10. Dzhurka N.G. Spatial Economic Interactions: Structures and Generated Effects. Edited by P.A. Minakir. Economic Research Institute FEB RAS. Khabarovsk: ERI FEB RAS, 2024, 272 p. (In Russian). 11. FIGARO-REG Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) Tables. European Commission, 2025. Available at: 12. Geschke A., Hadjikakou M. Virtual Laboratories and MRIO Analysis – An Introduction. Economic Systems Research, 2017, vol. 29, issue 2, pp. 143–157. 13. Huang S., Koutroumpis P. European Multi-Regional Input-Output Data for 2008–2018. Scientific Data, 2023, vol. 10. 218. 14. Interregional Input-Output Analysis of the Chinese Economy. Edited by S. Ichimura, H. Wang. Singapore: World Scientific, 2003, 240 p. 15. Inter-Regional Input-Output Table. 2005. Ministry of Economy; Trade and Industry. 2025. Available at: 16. Lenzen M., Geschke A., Malik A., Fry J., Lane J., Wiedmann T., Kenway S., Hoang K., Cadogan-Cowper A. New Multi-Regional Input-Output Databases for Australia – Enabling Timely and Flexible Regional Analysis. Economic Systems Research, 2017, vol. 29, issue 2, pp. 275–295. 17. Lenzen M., Geschke A., Wiedmann T., Lane J., Anderson N., Baynes T., Boland J., Daniels P., Dey C., Fry J., Hadjikakou M., Kenway S., Malik A., Moran D., Murray J., Nettleton S., Poruschi L., Reynolds C., Rowley H., Ugon J., Webb D., West J. Compiling and Using Input-Output Frameworks through Collaborative Virtual Laboratories. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, vol. 485–486, pp. 241–251. 18. Li J., Wang Z., Wang J., Tian K., Zhao W., Zhang Z., Zhang H., Zheng H., Li Y. Consumption-Based Carbon Emissions of 85 Federal Entities in Russia. Earth’s Future, 2024, vol. 12, issue 6, 14 p. 19. Liu W., Li X., Liu H., Tang Z., Guan D. Estimating Inter-Regional Trade Flows in China: A Sector-Specific Statistical Model. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2015, vol. 25, issue 10, pp. 1247–1263. 20. Losch А. The Economics of Location. Translated from German by V.N. Strelestkiy. Edited by A.G. Granberg. Moscow, 2007, 663 p. (In Russian). 21. Mi Z., Meng J., Zheng H., Shan Y., Wei Y., Guan D. A Multi-Regional Input-Output Table Mapping China’s Economic Outputs and Interdependencies in 2012. Scientific Data, 2018, vol. 5. 180155. 22. Moses L.N. The Stability of Interregional Trading Patterns and Input-Output Analysis. The American Economic Review, 1955, vol. 45, issue 5, pp. 803–826. 23. Parr J.B. Interaction in an Urban System: Aspects of Trade and Commuting. Economic Geography, 1987, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 223–240. 24. PBL EUREGIO database (2000–2010). European Union, 2025. Available at: 25. Polenske K. An Empirical Test of Interregional Input-Output Models: Estimation of 1963 Japanese Production. The American Economic Review, 1970, vol. 60, issue 2, pp. 76–82. 26. Russia Multi-Regional Input-Output Table. 2016. Carbon Emission Accounts and Datasets, 2025. Available at: 27. Sargento A.L.M., Ramos P.N., Hewings G.J.D. Inter-Regional Trade Flow Estimation through Non-Survey Models: An Empirical Assessment. Economic Systems Research, 2012, vol. 24, issue 2, pp. 173–193. 28. Shirov A.A. Assessment of Interregional Economic Interactions Using Statistics of Freight Railway Transportation. Problemy Prognozirovaniya = Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2020, no. 2, pp. 36–47. (In Russian). 29. Shuper V.A. Self-Organization of Urban Settlement System. Moscow, 1995, 166 p. (In Russian). 30. Shuper V.A. The Principle of Complementarity and the Theory of Central Places. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya = Regional Research of Russia, 1996, no. 4, pp. 88–94. (In Russian). 31. Taylor P.J., Hoyler M. Lost in Plain Sight: Revealing Central Flow Process in Christaller’s Original Central Place Systems. Regional Studies, 2021, vol. 55, issue 2, pp. 345–353. 32. Taylor P.J., Hoyler M., Verbruggen R. External Urban Relational Process: Introducing Central Flow Theory to Complement Central Place Theory. Urban Studies, 2010, vol. 47, issue 13, pp. 2803–2818. 33. Thissen M., Lankhuizen M., van Oort F., Los B., Diodato D. EUREGIO: The Construction of a Global IO Database with Regional Detail for Europe for 2000–2010. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2018-084/VI, 2018, 46 p. Available at: 34. Thissen M., van Oort F., Diodato D., Ruijs A. Regional Competitiveness and Smart Specialization in Europe: Place-Based Development in International Economic Networks. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2013, 255 p. 35. Wang Y., Geschke A., Lenzen M. Constructing a Time Series of Nested Multiregional Input-Output Tables. International Regional Science Review, 2015, vol. 40, issue 5, pp. 476–499. 36. Wiedmann T. An Input-Output Virtual Laboratory in Practice – Survey of Uptake, Usage and Applications of the First Operational IELab. Economic Systems Research, 2017, vol. 29, issue 2, pp. 296–312. 37. Zhang Y., Yuan J., Li J. The Methodology and Compilation of 2012 China Multi-Regional Input-Output Model. 25th International Input-Output Conference. Atlantic City, 2017. Available at: 38. Zhang Z., Shi M., Zhao Z. The Compilation of China’s Interregional Input-Output Model 2002. Economic Systems Research, 2015, vol. 27, issue 2, pp. 238–256. 39. Zheng H., Bai Y., Wei W., Meng J., Zhang Z., Song M., Guan D. Chinese Provincial Multi-Regional Input-Output Database for 2012, 2015, and 2017. Scientific Data, 2021, vol. 8, no. 244, 13 p. |
Financing | |
Submitted | 08.05.2025 |
Approved after reviewing | 15.05.2025 |
Accepted for publication | 23.05.2025 |
Available online | 30.06.2025 |