In the section | Articles |
Title of the article | Impact of Integration and Geopolitical Factors on Trade of the Russian Far East |
Pages | 40-70 |
Author | Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Izotov Doctor of Economics, Leading Research Fellow Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, 680042, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0001-9199-6226 |
Abstract | The purpose of the study is to quantify the impact of integration and geopolitical factors on trade of the Russian Far East with foreign countries. The estimates obtained on the basis of gravity modeling for 2000–2021 revealed the stimulating influence of integration factors (participation of Russia and trade partner countries in the WTO; Russia’s participation in ‘deep’ trade agreements) and the restraining influence of geopolitical factors (acute political confrontation between Russia and foreign countries; sanctions imposed on the Russian economy) on the Far East’s foreign trade. It was established that the participation of Russia and trade partner countries in the WTO contributed to the increase in foreign trade of the Russian Far East by 58%. The positive indirect influence of the ‘WTO factor’ and the stimulating effect of the global economic environment on foreign trade turnover of the Russian Far East was determined, indicating the ‘sensitivity’ of the macro-region’s open economy to trade liberalization at the global level. It was found that Russia’s creation of ‘deep’ integration formats with the Eurasian Economic Union countries and Vietnam contributed to an increase in the Far East’s trade with them by 141%, but the share of these economies in the macro-region’s foreign trade was small. It was found that the presence of an acute political conflict between Russia and foreign countries reduced the Far East’s trade with these countries by 79%, but due to the small share of these countries in the macro-region’s trade turnover, this effect was almost imperceptible. It was determined that the imposition of sanctions against Russia by a number of Western countries in 2014–2021 led to a 43% reduction in the Far East’s trade turnover with them and could contribute to the accelerated construction of infrastructure for the supply of hydrocarbons to the Chinese market, limiting the opportunities for geographical diversification of the macro-region’s exports |
Code | 338+339 |
JEL | C54, F15, F531 |
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2024.2.040-070 |
Keywords | trade, integration factors, geopolitical factors, foreign market, WTO, customs union, free trade zone, conflicts, sanctions, macro-region, region, Russia, Far East |
Download | SE.2024.2.040-070.Izotov.pdf |
For citation | Izotov D.A. Impact of Integration and Geopolitical Factors on Trade of the Russian Far East. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2024, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 40–70. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2024.2.040-070 (In Russian) |
References | 1. A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis. WTO; UNCTAD, 2012, 232 p. Available at: 2. Adarov A. Eurasian Economic Integration: Impact Evaluation Using the Gravity Model and the Synthetic Control Methods. Review of World Economics, 2023, vol. 159, pp. 467–504. 3. Anderson J.E., van Wincoop E. Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review, 2003, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 170–192. 4. Bali M., Rapelanoro N. How to Simulate International Economic Sanctions: A Multipurpo-se Index Modelling Illustrated with EU Sanctions Against Russia. International Economics, 2021, vol. 168, pp. 25–39. 5. Cristea A.D., Miromanova A. Firm-Level Trade Effects of WTO Accession: Evidence from Russia. Review of International Economics, 2022, vol. 30, issue 1, pp. 237–281. 6. Crozet M., Hinz J. Friendly Fire: The Trade Impact of the Russia Sanctions and Counter-Sanctions. Economic Policy, 2020, vol. 35, issue 101, pp. 97–146. 7. Davis L., Engerman S. History Lessons Sanctions: Neither War nor Peace. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 187–197. 8. Devaeva E.I., Goryunov A.P., Kotova T.E., Izotov D.A. Impact Assessment of Russia’s Accession to WTO for Russian Far East Foreign Trade. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2005, no. 3, pp. 64–84. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2005.3.064-084 (In Russian). 9. Dutt P. The WTO Is not Passe. European Economic Review, 2020, vol. 128, 103507. 10. Eaton J., Engers M. Sanctions. Journal of Political Economy, 1992, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 899–928. 11. Economic Cooperation between the Russian Far East and Asia-Pacific Countries. Edited by P.A. Minakir. ERI FEB RAS, The Sasakawa Peace Foundation. Khabarovsk, 2007, 208 p. (In Russian). 12. Esteve-Perez S., Gil-Pareja S., Llorca-Vivero R. Does the GATT/WTO Promote Trade? After All, Rose Was Right. Review of World Economics, 2020, vol. 156, pp. 377–405. 13. Felbermayr G., Morgan C.T., Syropoulos C., Yotov Y.V. Understanding Economic Sanctions: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Theory and Evidence. European Economic Review, 2021, vol. 135. 103720. 14. Florensa L.M., Marquez-Ramos L., Recalde M.L. The Effect of Economic Integration and Institutional Quality of Trade Agreements on Trade Margins: Evidence for Latin America. Review of World Economics, 2015, vol. 151, pp. 329–351. 15. Goldstein J.L., Rivers D., Tomz M. Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade. International Organization, 2007, vol. 61, issue 1, pp. 37–67. 16. Gu?jonsson S., Minelgaite I., Kristinsdottir H., Stankeviciene J. Who Benefits of Trade with China? Examining the Effects of Free Trade Agreements on Trade Flow with China Using an Adjusted Gravity Model. Journal of International Studies, 2021, vol. 14, issue 3, pp. 9–25. 17. Izotov D.A. The Institutional Factors of Russia’s Trade with Foreign Countries. Rossiyskiy Vneshneekonomicheskiy Vestnik = Russian Foreign Economic Journal, 2022, no. 9, pp. 7–25. 18. Izotov D.A. The Sectoral Dimension of Trade Expansion in the Western Macrozone of the Asia-Pacific Region: The Role of Global Formats. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2023a, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 117–144. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2023.4.117-144 (In Russian). 19. Izotov D.A. WTO Participation and Trade of the Asia-Pacific Region: Long-Term Effects. Vestnik Mezhdunarodnykh Organizatsyy: Obrazovanie, Nauka, Novaya Ekonomika = International Organisations Research Journal, 2023b, no. 3, pp. 48–73. 20. Kalinin A.M. Russia’s WTO Membership: Assessing the Impact on Foreign Trade. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 2023, no. 7, pp. 100–114. 21. Kamin K. Bilateral Trade and Conflict Heterogeneity: The Impact of Conflict on Trade Revisited. Kiel Institute for the World Economy. Working Papers No. 2222, 2022, 51 p. Available at: 22. Kirilakha A., Felbermayr G., Syropoulos C., Yalcin E., Yotov Y. The Global Sanctions Data Base: An Update That Includes the Years of the Trump Presidency. School of Economics; LeBow College of Business; Drexel University. Working Paper 2021-10, 2021, 45 p. Available at: 23. Kohl T., Brakman S., Garretsen H. Do Trade Agreements Stimulate International Trade Differently? Evidence from 296 Trade Agreements. The World Economy, 2016, vol. 39, issue 1, pp. 97–131. 24. Kontsevaya S., Smutka L. Influence of Russian Sanctions on Agricultural Trade between Russia and the European Union. Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, 2020, vol. 23, issue 1, pp. 13–26. 25. Kwon O., Syropoulos C., Yotov Y.V. The Extraterritorial Effects of Sanctions. CESifo. Working Paper No. 9578, 2022, 48 p. Available at: 26. Larch M., Luckstead J., Yotov Y. Economic Sanctions and Agricultural Trade. CESifo. Working Paper No. 9410, 2021, 48 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3961913 27. Larch M., Piermartini R., Yotov Y.V. On the Effects of GATT/WTO Membership on Trade: They Are Positive and Large After All. WTO. Working Paper No. ERSD-2019-09, 2019, 30 p. Available at: 28. Larch M., Shikher S., Syropoulos C., Yotov Y.V. Quantifying the Impact of Economic Sanctions on International Trade in the Energy and Mining Sectors. Economic Inquiry, 2022, vol. 60, issue 3, pp. 1038–1063. 29. Larch M., Yotov Y.V. Deep Trade Agreements and FDI in Partial and General Equilibrium: A Structural Estimation Framework. The World Bank. Working Papers 10338, 2023, 45 p. 30. Martin P., Mayer T., Thoenig M. The Geography of Conflicts and Regional Trade Agreements. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2012, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1–35. 31. Members and Observers. WTO, 2024. Available at: 32. Minakir P.A. ‘Turn to the East’ Policy: Expectations and Reality. Ekonomika Regiona = Economy of Region, 2017, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1016–1029. 33. Rasoulinezhad E. A New Evidence from the Effects of Russia’s WTO Accession on Its Foreign Trade. Eurasian Economic Review, 2018, vol. 8, pp. 73–92. 34. Regional Trade Agreements Database. WTO, 2024. Available at: 35. Saggi K., Wong W.F., Yildiz H.M. Should the WTO Require Free Trade Agreements to Eliminate Internal Tariffs? Journal of International Economics, 2019, vol. 118, pp. 316–330. 36. Syropoulos C., Felbermayr G., Kirilakha A., Yalcin E., Yotov Y.V. The Global Sanctions Data Base – Release 3: COVID-19, Russia, and Multilateral Sanctions. Review of International Economics, 2024, vol. 32, issue 1, pp. 12–48. 37. Taralashvili T. The Impact of Interstate Soft Conflicts on Bilateral Trade Flows Using Structural Gravity Model. The World Economy, 2024, vol. 47, issue 5, pp. 1943–1977. 38. Temurov I., Kilicaslan Y. Conflict or Distance: What Determines the International Trade. World Journal of Applied Economics, 2016, vol. 2, issue 2, pp. 15–31. 39. Tkachev I. How the Donetsk People’s Republic and Lugansk People’s Republic Trade with Russia. RBK [RBC], 2022, 23 February. Available at: 40. Yotov Y.V. Gravity at Sixty: The Workhorse Model of Trade. CESifo. Working Paper No. 9584, 2022a, 48 p. 41. Yotov Y.V. On the Role of Domestic Trade Flows for Estimating the Gravity Model of Trade. Contemporary Economic Policy, 2022b, vol. 40, issue 3, pp. 526–540. 42. Yotov Y.V., Piermartini R., Monteiro J.-A., Larch M. An Advanced Guide to Trade Policy Analysis: The Structural Gravity Model. WTO; UNCTAD, 2016, 140 p. Available at: |
Financing | |
Submitted | 06.05.2024 |
Approved after reviewing | 17.05.2024 |
Accepted for publication | 27.05.2024 |
Available online | 01.07.2024 |