| In the section | Articles |
| Title of the article | Hierarchical Structures of National Economic Spaces: The General and the Particular |
| Pages | 18-57 |
| Author | Natalya Gennadievna Dzhurka Candidate of Sciences (Economics) Senior Research Fellow Economic Research Institute FEB RAS, 153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, 680042, Russian Federation E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0001-9242-5636 |
| Abstract | The paper explores the structures of interregional economic interactions of two countries, Japan and China, that are different in terms of the scale of physical space and, accordingly, the density of economic activity. The methodological feature of the conducted cross-country study is the focus on the question of how far we can get starting from the position ‘all objects are unique’. The assumption of the existence of functional hierarchies is tested for the national economic spaces under consideration; the backbone of spatial economic interactions that form commodity markets homogeneous in terms of locational characteristics of supply and demand are constructed; system effects generated by the established structures of interactions are determined. As part of the search for evidence of the existence of functional hierarchies, real interregional balances are compared with theoretical balances built in accordance with the assumptions of the models of successively inclusive hierarchy of W. Christaller (without counter commodity flows between hierarchical levels) and A. Losch’s economic landscape (taking into account counter commodity flows between hierarchical levels). For comparison purposes, the centrality coefficient is used, the critical value of which in W. Christaller’s model is 100%, whereas in A. Losch’s model it is about 40%. The parameters of the existing functional hierarchies (mainly, the degree of homogeneity of national economic spaces with respect to interregional links and the ‘list’ of central functions) are determined using the method of dyadic factor analysis, and the system effects at different hierarchical levels – using the method of localized division of composite blocks of multipliers of interregional balances. The study has shown that the properties of economic spaces, indeed, depend on the parameters of physical spaces, but the degree of similarity of the structures of interregional interactions in countries with different parameters of physical spaces is not zero. In particular, the estimates indicate the existence of functional hierarchy in both Japan and China (the centrality coefficient in the two cases is about 40%), general multiplicative effects and the degree of self-sufficiency of the regions of the highest levels of functional hierarchies in Japan and China are comparable, whereas the values of system effects absorbed by these regions are different |
| Code | 303.725+332.122+339.3 |
| JEL | B41, R12, R15 |
| DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2023.4.018-057 |
| Keywords | interregional economic interactions, functional hierarchy, interregional matrix of social accounts, centrality coefficient, commodity markets, backbone of a network, system effect, Japan, China |
| Download | SE.2023.4.018-057.Dzhurka.pdf |
| For citation | Dzhurka N.G. Hierarchical Structures of National Economic Spaces: The General and the Particular. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2023, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 18–57. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2023.4.018-057 (In Russian) |
| References | 1. Akita T. Interregional Interdependence and Regional Economic Growth in Japan: An Input-Output Analysis. International Regional Science Review, 1994, vol. 16, issue 3, pp. 231–248. 2. Akita T., Kataoka M. Interregional Interdependence and Regional Economic Growth: An Interregional Input-Output Analysis of the Kyushu Region. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 2002, vol. 14, issue 1, pp. 18–40. 3. Berry B.J.L. Interdependency of Spatial Structure and Spatial Behavior: A General Field Theory Formulation. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1968, vol. 21, issue 1, pp. 205–227. 4. Black W.R. Toward a Factorial Ecology of Flows. Economic Geography, 1973, vol. 49, issue 1, pp. 59–67. 5. China Multi-Regional Input-Output Table. 2015. Carbon Emission Accounts and Datasets, 2023. Available at: (accessed September 2023). 6. Christaller W. Central Places in Southern Germany. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1966, 230 p. 7. Davies W.K.D., Thompson R.R. The Structure of Interurban Connectivity: A Dyadic Factor Analysis of Prairie Commodity Flows. Regional Studies, 1980, vol. 14, issue 4, pp. 297–311. 8. Dzhurka N.G. Central Places As a Conceptual Construct: Building the Structure of Spatial Markets on the Scale of the National Economy. Regionalistica [Regionalistics], 2023b, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 5–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2023.3.5 (In Russian). 9. Dzhurka N.G. Estimating the Effects of Economic Interactions in a Hierarchically Organized Space: Possibilities of the Balance Method. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2022, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 9–35. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2022.4.009-035 (In Russian). 10. Dzhurka N.G. Interregional Economic Interactions in the Light of Central Place Theory. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2023a, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 10–45. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2023.3.010-045 (In Russian). 11. Inter-Regional Input-Output Table. 2005. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, 2023. Available at: (Date обращения: сентябрь 2023). 12. Losch А. The Spatial Order of the Economy. Translated from German V.N. Streletskiy, edited by A.G. Granberg. Moscow, 2007, 663 p. (In Russian). 13. Minakir P.A., Isaev A.G., Demyanenko A.N., Prokapalo O.M. Economic Macroregions: An Integration Phenomenon or a Political Geographic Rationale? Far Eastern Russia Case. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2020, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 66–99. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2020.1.066-099 (In Russian). 14. Miyazawa K. Internal and External Matrix Multipliers in the Input-Output Model. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 1966, vol. 7, issue 1, pp. 38–55. 15. Nystuen J.D., Dacey M.F. A Graph Theory Interpretation of Nodal Regions. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 1961, vol. 7, issue 1, pp. 29–42. 16. Olfert M.R., Stabler J.C. Multipliers in a Central Place Hierarchy. Growth and Change, 1999, vol. 30, issue 2, pp. 288–302. 17. Poncet S. A Fragmented China: Measure and Determinants of Chinese Domestic Market Disintegration. Review of International Economics, 2005, vol. 13, issue 3, pp. 409–430. 18. Pyatt G., Round J.I. Accounting and Fixed Price Multipliers in a Social Accounting Matrix Framework. The Economic Journal, 1979, vol. 89, issue 356, pp. 850–873. 19. Robison M.H., Crapuchettes J. Measuring Central Place Hierarchies in Multi-Regional Input-Output Systems. 19th International Input-Output Conference (13–17 June, 2011, Washington), 2011. Available at: (accessed August 2023). 20. Robison M.H., Miller J.R. Central Place Theory and Intercommunity Input-Output Analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 1991, vol. 70, issue 4, pp. 399–417. 21. Rouget B. Graph Theory and Hierarchisation Models. Regional and Urban Economics, 1972, vol. 2, issue 3, pp. 263–296. 22. Round J.I. Decomposing Multipliers for Economic Systems Involving Regional and World Trade. The Economic Journal, 1985, vol. 95, issue 378, pp. 383–399. 23. Rummel R.J. Understanding Factor Analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1967, vol. 11, issue 4, pp. 444–480. 24. Sonis M., Hewings G.J.D. Economic Complexity as Network Complication: Multiregional Input-Output Structural Path Analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 1998, vol. 32, issue 3, pp. 407–436. 25. Sonis M., Hewings G.J.D. Hierarchies of Regional Sub-Structures and Their Multipliers within Input-Output Systems: Miyazawa Revisited. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 1993, vol. 34, issue 1, pp. 33–44. 26. Sonis M., Hewings G. J. D. Miyazawa Meets Christaller: Spatial Multipliers within Triple Decomposition of Input-Output Central Place Systems. University of Illinois, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory. Discussion Paper 03-T-30, 2003. Available at: (accessed August 2023). 27. Sonis M., Hewings G.J.D., Gazel R. The Structure of Multi-Regional Trade Flows: Hierarchy, Feedbacks and Spatial Linkages. The Annals of Regional Science, 1995, vol. 29, pp. 409–430. 28. Sonis M., Hewings G.J.D., Okuyama Y. Trade Typhoon Over Japan: Turbulence Metaphor and Spatial Production Cycles Feedback Loops of the Japanese Economy, 1980–85–90. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2002, vol. 7, pp. 111–119. 29. Sonis M., Oosterhaven J., Hewings J.D. Spatial Economic Structure and Structural Changes in the EC: Feedback Loop Input-Output Analysis. Economic Systems Research, 1993, vol. 5, issue 2, pp. 173–184. 30. Stabler J.C., Olfert M.R. Saskatchewan’s Communities in the 21st Century: From Places to Regions. Regina: University of Regina Press, 2002, 84 p. 31. Sun X., An H., Liu X. Network Analysis of Chinese Provincial Economies. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, vol. 492, pp. 1168–1180. 32. Wang T., Xiao Sh., Yan J., Zhang P. Regional and Sectoral Structures of the Chinese Economy: A Network Perspective from Multi-Regional Input-Output Tables. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2021, vol. 581. 126196. |
| Financing | |
| Submitted | 18.10.2023 |
| Approved after reviewing | 29.10.2023 |
| Accepted for publication | 02.11.2023 |
| Available online | 27.12.2023 |